7.16 : A nice, light subject for the CSPAN blog this time. Chinese dissidents! Wang Dan, speaking through an interpreter is criticizing the Chinese government. 2 thoughts so far…
1) Wang Dan is funny, but Dan Wang would be better and 2) I really need to figure out this whole Mandarin vs Cantonese deal. How ignorant can I really, ethically, remain about such a huge populace? Incredible, white man.
—
7.19: Wang’s interpreter sounds hot, but there has been no sign of her. More as events warrant.
—
7.20: Wang’s tag on the CSPAN chyron simply says “Wang Dan” with his title as “Chinese Dissident”. Do his business cards say this? How cool would that be? How’d you like to drop that at a cocktail party? “Oh REALLY…my cousin practices law too…Myself, I’m a (insert nationality here) Dissident…”
—
7.22: Answering a question about the possibility of a repeat of
Tiananmen Square…(with a far too brief wide-shot featuring the apparently SLIM translator)…Wang does not see any large-scale student demonstration on the horizon. Any future movements will not be concentrated in a big city, says Wang, but more spread throughout in more atomized communities. Well, at least he’s thought about it.
—
7.24: Thank god for Wikipedia. Thanks to Wiki, I know everything. A little background on Wang…Wang Dan (Chinese: 王丹; Pinyin: Wáng Dān) (born February 26, 1969), a leader of the Chinese democracy movement, was one of the most visible of the student leaders in the
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.
That’s nice. I’ve been making dick jokes about his name, and this guy’s like a supreme icon of democracy. That’s like finding out the guy in history class you’ve been calling a loser and a nerd ends up being Thomas Jefferson. Awesome.
—
7.28: Wang is wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and a vivid blue tie…very nicely put together. Meanwhile, it’s hard to tell if he’s advocating radicalism or merely explaining why it would and could exist in
China.
—
7.29: All the egg brains in the audience (wherever this is taking place) can’t come up with one freaking question for this guy. Way to go, establishment.
—
7.31: Wang says he’d love to see a democratic reform movement percolate up through the existing Chinese communist party structure. He then says this is as likely as a monkey flying out of his ass.
— 7.33: Well, I’ll say this for Wang. He’s awfully polite in enumerating the shortcomings of the Chinese government. He’s now critiquing the Chinese relationship with
Tibet with unfailing cheer and restraint. He says
China is trying to wait out the Dalai Lama, until he dies, and then renegotiate their terms with
Tibet. Hmm. Interesting.
—
7.34: Someone asks for Wang’s idea about how many were killed after Tiananmen. This should be interesting. He said that even though he trusts the Chinese investigated the whole affair thoroughly, we’ll never know the truth. He does cite the Red Cross of China’s figure, which says at least 2000 people were killed, and says he believes it. Shit, what a bummer this
China thing is when you pay like half-a-minute of attention to it. Good thing we’re in bed with them thanks to trade and their hosting the next Olympics and stuff.
That’s all for now…